Alright, that sounds like consensus on releasing now, to me. Forging ahead with what's in master now.
- Ian On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sounds like we have a consensus on that, then: No feeds this release, >> unblock the release, and full steam ahead w/o them!. >> >>> On 8/28/15 7:37 PM, Till Westmann wrote: >>> I would agree. >>> To me the main focus of this release is our ability to release and not >>> necessarily features (even though it’s certainly nice if we have new >>> working features ;). >>> When this release is out, we could immediately work on getting the missing >>> pieces in and do another release (ideally with another release manager to >>> spread the knowledge about the process and to smoothen the process). >>> >>> My 2c, >>> Till >>> >>>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Chen Li <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Heri was trying to make this part work. Any update from him? >>>> >>>> In general, if we cannot make secondary feeds work and documented quickly, >>>> I don't think it's a good idea to include it in this release. >>>> >>>> Chen >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What's in master (in the docs) seems to work OK, but that's just >>>>> connecting a source to a dataset directly. There's some issue with >>>>> printing some tweets (e.g. for $x in dataset Tweets return $x) that >>>>> contain special characters, but I'm not sure where that comes from. >>>>> However I haven't had much luck getting the secondary feeds/functions >>>>> to work. The original documentation seemed to refer to a function that >>>>> was renamed/moved, but the renamed function (addHashTags) didn't work >>>>> right for me either ( in https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/359/). >>>>> >>>>> If there was a function (that will work reliably) we could use to >>>>> create a secondary feed that's already in the code, I think that would >>>>> let us include that feature in the docs. Without that though, I don't >>>>> know what else can be done besides leaving it hidden for the immediate >>>>> future. >>>>> >>>>> - Ian >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Michael Carey <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Q: So where are things on the feeds front - in terms of what's documented >>>>>> and what works as advertised (and documented)? >>
