Yes, that's what I had in mind. That way there's one less routing step for 
infra. 

Cheers,
Till

> On Aug 31, 2015, at 13:10, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Till,
> Sure. I just added the Nexus component to it. Is that what you had in mind?
> I'm going to try staging Hyracks anyway right now, just to see if it
> works though.
> 
> -Ian
> 
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>> 
>> could you add a component to the JIRA (can’t do it myself)?
>> Otherwise I think that it might fall through the cracks.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>> 
>>> On Aug 29, 2015, at 9:51 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> To update:
>>> We're blocked on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10220 at
>>> the moment. There's no entry in the Apache Nexus repository for
>>> Hyracks' groupid, we need that to release. Once that's cleared I'll
>>> stage and propose the vote for Hyracks, then once that's released, do
>>> the same for AsterixDB.
>>> 
>>> -Ian
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Raman Grover <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I am sorry I didn't have an opportunity to address the issues because of 
>>>> commitments from day job and official travel.
>>>> 
>>>> I am pretty much determined to get things right. As soon as I find some 
>>>> bandwidth, I will work on it and keep you posted.
>>>> 
>>>> Stay tuned!
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Raman
>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 29, 2015, at 10:53 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Alright, that sounds like consensus on releasing now, to me. Forging
>>>>> ahead with what's in master now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Ian
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sounds like we have a consensus on that, then:  No feeds this release, 
>>>>>>> unblock the release, and full steam ahead w/o them!.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 8/28/15 7:37 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
>>>>>>>> I would agree.
>>>>>>>> To me the main focus of this release is our ability to release and not 
>>>>>>>> necessarily features (even though it’s certainly nice if we have new 
>>>>>>>> working features ;).
>>>>>>>> When this release is out, we could immediately work on getting the 
>>>>>>>> missing pieces in and do another release (ideally with another release 
>>>>>>>> manager to spread the knowledge about the process and to smoothen the 
>>>>>>>> process).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> My 2c,
>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Chen Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Heri was trying to make this part work.  Any update from him?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> In general, if we cannot make secondary feeds work and documented 
>>>>>>>>> quickly,
>>>>>>>>> I don't think it's a good idea to include it in this release.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Chen
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> What's in master (in the docs) seems to work OK, but that's just
>>>>>>>>>> connecting a source to a dataset directly. There's some issue with
>>>>>>>>>> printing some tweets (e.g. for $x in dataset Tweets return $x) that
>>>>>>>>>> contain special characters, but I'm not sure where that comes from.
>>>>>>>>>> However I haven't had much luck getting the secondary feeds/functions
>>>>>>>>>> to work. The original documentation seemed to refer to a function 
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> was renamed/moved, but the renamed function (addHashTags) didn't work
>>>>>>>>>> right for me either ( in 
>>>>>>>>>> https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/359/).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> If there was a function (that will work reliably) we could use to
>>>>>>>>>> create a secondary feed that's already in the code, I think that 
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> let us include that feature in the docs. Without that though, I don't
>>>>>>>>>> know what else can be done besides leaving it hidden for the 
>>>>>>>>>> immediate
>>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - Ian
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Michael Carey <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Q: So where are things on the feeds front - in terms of what's 
>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>> and what works as advertised (and documented)?
>> 

Reply via email to