+1 Steven On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Mike Carey <dtab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed. Something else we should do sometime in January - have a > discussion with any/all interested folks (maybe also an opt-in Skype call?) > to review ALL our metadata datasets and make sure we like what we see. :-) > > > On 12/22/15 1:12 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > >> As I haven’t written this before: I think that it should go into master >> as we have discovered that we’ll need more Metadata-breaking changes. >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >> On 17 Dec 2015, at 23:23, Steven Jacobs wrote: >> >> I submitted a patch for my Metadata change here: >>> https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/558/1 >>> >>> Right now the review is for Master. I think there is some motivation to >>> push it into the release branch (as it is a "breaking" issue for >>> reverse-compatibility) rather than master, but I'm not sure. >>> >>> Please reply if you have a strong opinion either way. >>> >>> Steven >>> >> >
