Hi Madhan,
When I see the phrase 'relationship attributes', I am never quite sure 
whether we are referring to the attributes of an entity that relate to 
another entity or the attributes of the relationship instance itself. I 
think the phrase ' relationship attributes' more naturally fits as the 
attributes of the relationship itself; we are using it in the other sense.

I suggest we change the relationshipAttributes in the entity to 
relationships (if you really want attributes in the name we could call it 
relatingAttributes)- and use the term 'relationship attributes' purely for 
the attributes of the relationship itself. What do you think?
                all the best, David. 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Reply via email to