[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16211131#comment-16211131
]
Andrew Hulbert commented on ATLAS-1757:
---------------------------------------
[~davidrad] I'll try to take a look over at the Virtual Data Connector pages
and discussions. I think that "field-level" visibility is definitely something
that's useful for what I'm working on but the "cell-level" visibility is
probably (as you mentioned) not as much on the radar at the moment. But I'll
try to chat with he VD connector group and see what they are thinking. We have
customers that need to segregate data from different divisions and want that
strong guarantee on a per "entity" basis.
> Proposal to update graph DB
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: ATLAS-1757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1757
> Project: Atlas
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: atlas-core
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Graham Wallis
> Attachments: ATLAS-1757 Proposal to change graph database.pdf,
> ATLAS-1757-v1.patch, ATLAS-1757-v2.patch
>
>
> Given the formation of the JanusGraph open source project (under the Linux
> Foundation) to continue the development and support of the Titan DB, should
> we aim to deprecate Titan and move over to JanusGraph?
> If we did this, we could keep the graph abstraction layer and use it to
> support Titan 0, Titan 1 and JanusGraph.
> Are there other graph databases that we should consider?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
