[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16211258#comment-16211258
]
David Radley commented on ATLAS-1757:
-------------------------------------
[~hulbs] The equivalent to the RDB grant is all done through Ranger - which
gives us great separation of responsibility and flexibility. I have no reason
to think that Apache Ranger mechanism is not strong enough for the use cases we
have looked at.
If the data really needs to be separate - and does not need to be joined, then
it might make sense to have them in separate data lakes - i.e. separate
Atlas's.
> Proposal to update graph DB
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: ATLAS-1757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1757
> Project: Atlas
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: atlas-core
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Graham Wallis
> Attachments: ATLAS-1757 Proposal to change graph database.pdf,
> ATLAS-1757-v1.patch, ATLAS-1757-v2.patch
>
>
> Given the formation of the JanusGraph open source project (under the Linux
> Foundation) to continue the development and support of the Titan DB, should
> we aim to deprecate Titan and move over to JanusGraph?
> If we did this, we could keep the graph abstraction layer and use it to
> support Titan 0, Titan 1 and JanusGraph.
> Are there other graph databases that we should consider?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
