-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66784/#review201859
-----------------------------------------------------------




omrs/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/omrs/archivemanager/opentypes/OpenMetadataTypesArchive.java
Line 10962 (original), 10962 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66784/#comment283470>

    attributesTypedBy is clearer



omrs/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/omrs/archivemanager/opentypes/OpenMetadataTypesArchive.java
Line 10963 (original), 10963 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66784/#comment283471>

    The description should be a sentence in English.  This means it starts with 
a captial letter and does not include camel-case words.  I would keep the 
description the same.


- Mandy Chessell


On April 24, 2018, 8:48 p.m., David Radley wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66784/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 24, 2018, 8:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas, Madhan Neethiraj and Mandy Chessell.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ATLAS2604
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS2604
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ATLAS2604 Minor fixups to open metadata archive types to avoid duplicate 
> attributes due to relationship end names.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> omrs/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/omrs/archivemanager/opentypes/OpenMetadataTypesArchive.java
>  faab96cac 
>   
> omrs/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/omrs/archivemanager/opentypes/TestOpenMetadataTypesArchive.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66784/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran junit that failed without the patch applied. I ran this in Intellij using 
> the  Maven view to run the test phase on the OMRS module. This successfully 
> ran the test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Radley
> 
>

Reply via email to