Hi, Thanks for answering the above questions. The changes of proposal makes sense to me. Looking forward to the implementation of this proposal.
Regards, Nicholas Jiang On 2025/12/08 09:42:31 Mang Zhang wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > Thanks for your reply. Your questions are excellent, and I will address each > one in turn. > >1. Could you provide overall architecture of flink integration in this > >proposal? There is no any introduction of Flink integration architecture. > I have added the architecture section and included the architecture diagram. > Thank you for your suggestion. > >2. Could describe proposed changes in more detail? The description of > >`Implementation` section is a little simple like `Support Flink RowData to > >Arrow`. > Thank you for the reminder. I have revised that section. > >3. The interfaces like `SupportsAuronNative` listed in `Implementation` > >section are public interfaces for community developers. IMO, we could move > >these interfaces to `Public Interfaces`. WDYT? > Thank you for the reminder. I have adjusted this section of the structure. > >4. The proposed changes of `Support Flink Built-in functions`, `Support > >Flink Connector` and `Support Native Format` are lack of change detail. For > >example, how to support flink connector? Which common interfaces should the > >developer implement? > Thank you for the reminder. I have refined the documentation, listing the > interfaces that need to be implemented using the Kafka connector as an > example. > > > Thank you for your suggestion. After discussing further details offline, we > have decided to change the name of API-1[1] to API-1: Introduce Flink > integration of native engine . The document has been revised. Looking > forward to your feedback. > > > > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z3Noy4C9Lv54zEuL9MfGXohrDsIUh9zBpxOkmulRM6s/edit?usp=sharing > > -- > > Best regards, > Mang Zhang > > > > At 2025-12-01 17:18:32, "Nicholas Jiang" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi Mang Zhang, > > > >Thanks for driving the proposal of Flink SQL support. This integration makes > >great significance to flink users for native vectorized execution. I have > >some questions about this proposal: > > > >1. Could you provide overall architecture of flink integration in this > >proposal? There is no any introduction of Flink integration architecture. > > > >2. Could describe proposed changes in more detail? The description of > >`Implementation` section is a little simple like `Support Flink RowData to > >Arrow`. > > > >3. The interfaces like `SupportsAuronNative` listed in `Implementation` > >section are public interfaces for community developers. IMO, we could move > >these interfaces to `Public Interfaces`. WDYT? > > > >4. The proposed changes of `Support Flink Built-in functions`, `Support > >Flink Connector` and `Support Native Format` are lack of change detail. For > >example, how to support flink connector? Which common interfaces should the > >developer implement? > > > >Looking forward to answers of above question. > > > >Regards, > >Nicholas Jiang > > > >On 2025/11/28 06:04:56 Mang Zhang wrote: > >> Hi, everyone > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> I'd like to start a discussion about AIP-1: Flink SQL + Auron > >> Collaboration [1]. > >> > >> Spark SQL on Auron has been highly successful, so I believe it's time to > >> explore Flink SQL on Auron. > >> > >> Looking forward to your feedback. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z3Noy4C9Lv54zEuL9MfGXohrDsIUh9zBpxOkmulRM6s/edit?usp=sharing > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Mang Zhang >
