Hi everyone, Thank you to all those who participated in the discussion, the program has been gradually revised and improved, everyone has reached a consensus. I will relaunch vote soon.
> On Dec 9, 2025, at 10:40, Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for answering the above questions. The changes of proposal makes sense > to me. Looking forward to the implementation of this proposal. > > Regards, > Nicholas Jiang > >> On 2025/12/08 09:42:31 Mang Zhang wrote: >> Hi Nicholas, >> Thanks for your reply. Your questions are excellent, and I will address each >> one in turn. >>> 1. Could you provide overall architecture of flink integration in this >>> proposal? There is no any introduction of Flink integration architecture. >> I have added the architecture section and included the architecture diagram. >> Thank you for your suggestion. >>> 2. Could describe proposed changes in more detail? The description of >>> `Implementation` section is a little simple like `Support Flink RowData to >>> Arrow`. >> Thank you for the reminder. I have revised that section. >>> 3. The interfaces like `SupportsAuronNative` listed in `Implementation` >>> section are public interfaces for community developers. IMO, we could move >>> these interfaces to `Public Interfaces`. WDYT? >> Thank you for the reminder. I have adjusted this section of the structure. >>> 4. The proposed changes of `Support Flink Built-in functions`, `Support >>> Flink Connector` and `Support Native Format` are lack of change detail. For >>> example, how to support flink connector? Which common interfaces should the >>> developer implement? >> Thank you for the reminder. I have refined the documentation, listing the >> interfaces that need to be implemented using the Kafka connector as an >> example. >> >> >> Thank you for your suggestion. After discussing further details offline, we >> have decided to change the name of API-1[1] to API-1: Introduce Flink >> integration of native engine . The document has been revised. Looking >> forward to your feedback. >> >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z3Noy4C9Lv54zEuL9MfGXohrDsIUh9zBpxOkmulRM6s/edit?usp=sharing >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> Mang Zhang >> >> >> >> At 2025-12-01 17:18:32, "Nicholas Jiang" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Mang Zhang, >>> >>> Thanks for driving the proposal of Flink SQL support. This integration >>> makes great significance to flink users for native vectorized execution. I >>> have some questions about this proposal: >>> >>> 1. Could you provide overall architecture of flink integration in this >>> proposal? There is no any introduction of Flink integration architecture. >>> >>> 2. Could describe proposed changes in more detail? The description of >>> `Implementation` section is a little simple like `Support Flink RowData to >>> Arrow`. >>> >>> 3. The interfaces like `SupportsAuronNative` listed in `Implementation` >>> section are public interfaces for community developers. IMO, we could move >>> these interfaces to `Public Interfaces`. WDYT? >>> >>> 4. The proposed changes of `Support Flink Built-in functions`, `Support >>> Flink Connector` and `Support Native Format` are lack of change detail. For >>> example, how to support flink connector? Which common interfaces should the >>> developer implement? >>> >>> Looking forward to answers of above question. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nicholas Jiang >>> >>> On 2025/11/28 06:04:56 Mang Zhang wrote: >>>> Hi, everyone >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'd like to start a discussion about AIP-1: Flink SQL + Auron >>>> Collaboration [1]. >>>> >>>> Spark SQL on Auron has been highly successful, so I believe it's time to >>>> explore Flink SQL on Auron. >>>> >>>> Looking forward to your feedback. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z3Noy4C9Lv54zEuL9MfGXohrDsIUh9zBpxOkmulRM6s/edit?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Mang Zhang >>
