yes, makes it easier to donate when its Apache License 2.0, but still requires the IP clearance [1], which is handled through the IPMC. This is required so there is an audit trail of that software being donated to the ASF
-Jake [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Bill Farner <[email protected]> wrote: > Jake - i'm not fully versed on licenses, but is that true even though it's > all Apache License 2.0? > > -=Bill > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jake Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > no objections, but we would have to get an IP clearance doc from Twitter > > for this code in order to bring this code into the ASF > > > > -Jake > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Zameer Manji <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > Aurora depends heavily on twitter-commons for lots of functionality. > > > However upstream is not very active and I suspect that it will be less > > > active in the future. Currently we depend on artifacts published from > > this > > > project which causes us to depend on older versions of guava and guice. > > > > > > As a result, it seems that will be difficult to address tickets like > > > AURORA-1380 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1380> > without > > > changing something. I propose we fork all of the java portions of > > > twitter-commons into our tree, remove the parts we don't use and update > > > guava and guice so we can move forward on this front. > > > > > > What are people's thoughts on this? > > > > > > -- > > > Zameer Manji > > > > > >
