Thanks, Jake! -=Bill
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jake Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, makes it easier to donate when its Apache License 2.0, but still > requires the IP clearance [1], which is handled through the IPMC. This is > required so there is an audit trail of that software being donated to the > ASF > > -Jake > > [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Bill Farner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Jake - i'm not fully versed on licenses, but is that true even though > it's > > all Apache License 2.0? > > > > -=Bill > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jake Farrell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > no objections, but we would have to get an IP clearance doc from > Twitter > > > for this code in order to bring this code into the ASF > > > > > > -Jake > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Zameer Manji <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > Aurora depends heavily on twitter-commons for lots of functionality. > > > > However upstream is not very active and I suspect that it will be > less > > > > active in the future. Currently we depend on artifacts published from > > > this > > > > project which causes us to depend on older versions of guava and > guice. > > > > > > > > As a result, it seems that will be difficult to address tickets like > > > > AURORA-1380 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1380> > > without > > > > changing something. I propose we fork all of the java portions of > > > > twitter-commons into our tree, remove the parts we don't use and > update > > > > guava and guice so we can move forward on this front. > > > > > > > > What are people's thoughts on this? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Zameer Manji > > > > > > > > > >
