On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Erb, Stephan <stephan....@blue-yonder.com> wrote:
> I'll try to spin up a centos box myself and see how that goes. > Re-running through testing I hit more basic roadblocks. Its not clear to me what / how I built here! Apologies for wasting your time - I'll get in a few patches and then kick off a new vote. > > > Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our > > dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything. *I can > send > > a patch for that if others agree.* > > We also have to be more diligent in tracking the Mesos version we depend > on. It already got out of date here [1] and here [2]. > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md#mesos-on-centos-7 > [2] > https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/specs/rpm/aurora.spec#L41 > > > ________________________________________ > From: Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> > Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 21:34 > To: dev@aurora.apache.org; jsir...@apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.12.0 rpms > > -1 > > I'm had trouble getting these to work. I used the vagrant environment > here: > https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/test/rpm/centos-7 Agreed - this vote has failed. > > > *Executor:* > $ sudo rpm -ivh aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > docker is needed by aurora-executor-0.12.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64 > > Apparently the official docker package is called docker-engine > https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/linux/centos/ > > Dependency naming aside, i think we should omit docker from our > dependencies, as it really should be a mesos dep if anything. *I can send > a patch for that if others agree.* > > *Scheduler:* > I had trouble getting the scheduler to start, it exits due to an uncaught > exception in the main thread, and unfortunately a stack trace doesn't turn > up in journalctl. We need to figure out why the errors don't show up, > possibly in conjunction with addressing the items below. > > Doing some investigation, i noticed something strange - JAVA_OPTS (set in > /etc/sysconfig/aurora) doesn't make it to the process launched by systemd. > It seems to be discarded when /usr/bin/aurora-scheduler-startup calls > /usr/lib/aurora/bin/aurora-scheduler. Other variables (e.g. > AURORA_SCHEDULER_OPTS) propagate fine. I've probably been staring at this > too long and am missing something obvious, but i'm not making sense of it. > > Sidestepping the above issue, i discovered 2 reasons the scheduler won't > start up: > - Default backup dir /var/lib/aurora/scheduler/backups does not exist, > insufficient permission to create > > - Fails to load the mesos native lib > aurora-scheduler-startup[8500]: Failed to load native Mesos library from > /usr/lib;/usr/lib64 > I was able to fix this by removing ;/usr/lib64 from > -Djava.library.path='/usr/lib;/usr/lib64', alternatively by removing the > library.path setting and exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib. > > Happy to pitch in on fixing these issues, curious what folks think of the > items above, especially the JAVA_OPTS issue. > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Pinging this VOTE and noting that the close is Monday at 11am Mountain > > time. > > > > Please test! > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, John Sirois <jsir...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm > > packaging > > >> for Apache Aurora 0.12.0. > > >> > > >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/ > > >> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>* > > >> > > >> The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following: > > >> --- > > >> The CHANGELOG is viewable at: > > >> * > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x > > >> < > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/0.12.x;hp=refs/heads/0.11.x > > >* > > >> > > >> The branch used to create the packaging is: > > >> > > >> > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.12.x > > >> > > >> The packages are available at: > > >> *https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/ > > >> <https://dl.bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/>* > > >> > > >> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS > > >> > > >> Please download, verify, and test. > > >> > > >> The vote will close on Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:00:00 -0700 > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.12.0 > > >> > > > > > > Correction - "Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora > 0.12.0" > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because... > > >> --- > > >> > > >> > > > And again, copypasta - "Please consider verifying these rpms using the > > > install guide:" > > > > > > Please consider verifying these debs using the install guide: > > >> https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md > > >> > > >> > > >> I'd like to kick off voting with my own +1 > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- John Sirois 303-512-3301
