+1 ... with minor nagging reservations. I could only get the packages tested out after applying the provision.sh fixes here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49740/ I think the 0.15.0 release is supposed to be compatible back to mesos 0.27(.2) though; thus the reservations. I need to dig a bit more on the test failure (aurora-scheduler failed to start on debian-jessie - did not try other platforms before the linked RB fix), but I was wondering what other folks found without the above linked RB patch.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > All, > > > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb > and rpm packaging for Apache Aurora 0.15.0: > > > https://dl.bintray.com/mkhutornenko/aurora/ > > > The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following: > > --- > > The branch used to create the packaging is: > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.15.x > > > The packages are available at: > > https://dl.bintray.com/mkhutornenko/aurora/ > > > The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS > > > Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are > available here > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.15.x > > > The vote will close on Mon Jul 11 18:55:16 PDT 2016 > > > > [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.15.0 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because... > > > I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1 >
