I missed Maxim's ~same fix here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49732/
Folks will need that patch to test, which is not on master, but on the 0.15.x branch of aurora-packaging. On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:22 PM, John Sirois <john.sir...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 ... with minor nagging reservations. > > I could only get the packages tested out after applying the provision.sh > fixes here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49740/ > I think the 0.15.0 release is supposed to be compatible back to mesos > 0.27(.2) though; thus the reservations. > I need to dig a bit more on the test failure (aurora-scheduler failed to > start on debian-jessie - did not try other platforms > before the linked RB fix), but I was wondering what other folks found > without the above linked RB patch. > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> All, >> >> >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb >> and rpm packaging for Apache Aurora 0.15.0: >> >> >> https://dl.bintray.com/mkhutornenko/aurora/ >> >> >> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following: >> >> --- >> >> The branch used to create the packaging is: >> >> >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.15.x >> >> >> The packages are available at: >> >> https://dl.bintray.com/mkhutornenko/aurora/ >> >> >> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS >> >> >> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are >> available here >> >> >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.15.x >> >> >> The vote will close on Mon Jul 11 18:55:16 PDT 2016 >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.15.0 >> >> [ ] +0 >> >> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because... >> >> >> I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1 >> > >
