On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:10, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > How about a couple of weeks? Any chance of you fixing the mess you made > > with all the incompatible changes to thread stuff? > > Let me look at the gump complaints on thread stuff.
They are what I have already outlined. Incompatible changes in signature both return type of all the methods. > Also do you know why we are not getting nags? We are supposed to be > informed when our stuff doesn't build. Gump produces nags when builds fail (and I assume we will see a few next run for things like excalibur-cli). It does not by default produce nags when prereqs fail which means the fact that swathes are not building (ie phoenix) will never get informed of this. I used to send nags on prereq failures for somethings but because more time was spent failing to build than actually building I disabled it. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *----------------------------------------------------* | "the mother of idiots is always pregnant." | *----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
