Peter Donald wrote, On 11/03/2003 22.15: ...
...backward incompatible changes are all the rage in AValon these days. Supporting users is sooo yesterday.
It's not.
We will support users as much as we can. We've said it before, we say it again. Any incompatible change made was completely unintentional.
To catch these early (yes, Gump should be our *last* resort), we should have unit tests running regularly on the classes; they would have probably caught these signature changes.
What do you all think should be our unit test policy?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
