On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:57, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > the paragraph that follows is working from my impression that > your 'my code broke' remark above has been pressed into service > as a justification for some of your vetos. if that is not the > case, then ignore the rest of this message.
Not the case. The problem is breaking backwards compatability in library code for no reason or for a poor reason. If there is a good reason to break backwards compat then I am all for it but if there is not then it will be a problem ... at least if I notice and care and that mostly associated with stuff I use. -- Cheers, Peter Donald "All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific." -- Jane Wagner --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
