Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Peter Donald wrote:
It is just "organisation". Framework CVS/Code/whatever is stable now and one of the few pieces we have managed to a decent level of quality. Sure theres plenty of stuff about it that still crap but it works and people respect if for being stable.
Agreed. There is 'crap' in the framework, as much as 'cobol' is crap or AS/400 is 'crap', but remove it without providing a significant (socially and economically) migration path would litterarely make the world collapse.
All of the other stuff you mentioned is not anywhere near that level of quality of framework - so why group them together. What possible advantage is there to pushing bits around? Would it not be more productive to focus on improving the quality of the code?
The real issue is: nothing should ever enter the framework CVS without a previous community design phase aimed to create consensus.
did that phase happen?
YES - and its probably one of the best examples of Avalon Community collaboration ever.
after that, nobody should be able to place vetos. avalon is owned by the community, not by individuals.
+1
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
