Berin,
1) Add an attribute to the root config element in the .xconf which identifies the type of config we want such as "proxy-type".
2) proxy-type="none" uses a NoopWrapperObjectFactory (one that does nothing)
There have been many discussions about this in the past for people to find out about the pros/cons of proxies/wrappers. So leaving that discussion alone, I have another different but related question. We (at Keel) have been modifying our code-base to adapt to proxies, the primary interest being able to stay current with Fortress and the next-gen container. The question I have is that if we (or others) start using the "none" option here, what is the impact from the future-proof POV? In other words, what features (using your crystal ball) might we be loosing out on if we do not work well with proxies?
Shash
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
