On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:53 am, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > No one is maintaining Cornerstone yet so until > > that time maybe best to move it into Sandbox? > > No one is maintaining Cornerstone? How do you figure? I thought that you > and others were maintaining Cornerstone along with Phoenix, and that Merlin > supports Cornerstone components.
Half of cornerstone is junk code, half is okay. There is no real unit testing, no maintainable release process and no documentation. Some of the designs in there are just plain bad legacy items from about 3 years ago when I initially wrote major chunks of it. The people who contributed to the components no longer use them, dont have committer access or have rewritten better components. I have rewritten parts that I need and added unit tests, schema validation and documentation and don't plan to go back to using cornerstone that is poor quality code, release process and mirred by politics. -- Cheers, Peter Donald *--------------------------------------------* | "You can't fight in here! This is the war | | room!" -Dr. Strangelove | *--------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
