> From: Anton Tagunov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > In fact if we have dependency > > A - > B > > but A has inline activation and B - background, A will > still be (probably?) initialized before B.
Doesn't that mean that B will be initialized as a part of A's init, as lazy init kicks in? /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
