Calling for a vote is about the least productive thing you could do to get consensus. If you want consensus then address the real issue. That means addressing the real problems of a container understanding the full implication of component deployment.
I am not even going to bother voting on this vote. This is simply a mistake. I will consider it totally invalid and I certainly will not feel bound by any outcome. Until we recognize and address and solution to the problem of full and complete description of a components requirements to a container – we are simply not addressing the real problem. Either abstract the problem or solve the problem. Calling a vote is a waste of everyone’s time.
Stephen, it is this anti cooperative spirit that is causing most of the problems. We can continue the discussion of you refusing to cooperate on the PMC list. For now, the vote stands, and any publicly released Avalon technology *will* be bound by its outcome. I advise you to vote.
If you refuse to abide by the decisions of the Avalon team, then I highly recommend you reevaluate that position.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
