At some risk, I'd like to reopen this then. Proposal :
1) We strive for a lowest common denominator (LCD) approach with embracing of multiple value-added implementation, which may end up divergent without that being considered a failure. Thus A-F's Java interfaces are our point of unification. There is no single container. There is no unified assembly or configuration meta info specification at the application level. XML and other.
2) We drop a unified component-level meta info dependancy and configuration design. XML and other.
This has been discussed to the tune of a million characters. Let us just see which of the two above committers have moved on (or not).
With all do respect, Paul, if we do this, then our job is done. THe Avalon CVS is all that we should keep and everything else goes by-by.
The fun stuff would all be done elsewhere.
I fail to get excited about this proposal. Maybe it's just me. I gave your proposal some more visibility to see if it is just me.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
