On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:24:53AM -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> The NanoKernel approach (smaller than MicroKernel) would let us add in 
> exactly
> what we needed.  Features could be added in like components/modules.  The
> default set would be your ultra-lightwieght container.  Your super-phoenix
> would be made possible as well.  In fact new features we haven't thought of
> yet could all be made part of the container without forcing us all to agree
> to one set of requirements.

This sounds great. :)

Cheers,

Marcus

-- 
        .....
     ,,$$$$$$$$$,      Marcus Crafter
    ;$'      '$$$$:    Computer Systems Engineer
    $:         $$$$:   ManageSoft GmbH
     $       o_)$$$:   82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
     ;$,    _/\ &&:'   60327 Frankfurt Germany
       '     /( &&&
           \_&&&&'
          &&&&.
    &&&&&&&:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to