On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:24:53AM -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote: > The NanoKernel approach (smaller than MicroKernel) would let us add in > exactly > what we needed. Features could be added in like components/modules. The > default set would be your ultra-lightwieght container. Your super-phoenix > would be made possible as well. In fact new features we haven't thought of > yet could all be made part of the container without forcing us all to agree > to one set of requirements.
This sounds great. :) Cheers, Marcus -- ..... ,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter ;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer $: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse ;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany ' /( &&& \_&&&&' &&&&. &&&&&&&: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]