On Tuesday 09 September 2003 16:29, Leo Simons wrote: > > Lets disucss some more the rationale for doing this. My point is that > > it is (a) not needed, and (b) a negative value proposition. > > my point is that it is > > (a) pragmatic > (b) needed in applications that import the 'avalon-framework' logical > extension package and expect to find both api and impl > (c) we've been over this before and decided it was a good idea; nothing > significant has changed since then so it is pointless to revisit old > arguments > (d) needed (see above)
Agree. Documentation says api/impl, but combined supported for historic reasons. Shouldn't be such a big deal (compared to NB that does bytecode alterations and all kind of hocus-pokus (perhaps to ensure employment) to be binary compatible when APIs changes). Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
