> > dont you think this can introduice a confusion with http://avalon.net
> I don't know.. what I know is that ".net" suffix used by MS it's
> not copyright (for obvious reasons) so it's a kind of standard.
> if you need some codename here are my 2cents:
> avalon-sharp, avalonet, avalon-dotnet
> Yup. I think Berin suggested Avalon#. The "sharp" idea is nice, but a
> implicit strong relation of Avalon and C# is sad.
> it could be done using any language supported by CLR
If you are looking for a name, you could see if Excalibur is going to be
available, with the refactoring of Avalon. It is a play on the word
"sharp". Or just something like avalon-clr (the official name is the CLI,
but that would be too confusing).
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
