Berin Loritsch wrote:
Anyway, fortress is /very/ close to being very usable as a nanokernel. To make that happen, all that we need to do is transfer more of the responsibilities to the component factories. Pico is a nice example of how well this works: more and more responsibility transferred into the component adapters / component adapter factories until only 50 lines or so remain in the actual container code.

Ok. So are you saying Fortress would be scalable enough to include Merlin's features as needed?

I wouldn't dare say anything as controversial as that! :P


Thing is, if you build a container out of components, then you can put those components inside a container. Layered complexity, if you will. I can't see why you couldn't layer merlin's features on top of fortress. I also can't see why you can't do it the other way around.

I'm also not sure whether any of that is a good idea.

Keep in mind that the last time I tried and completely grok merlins internals was roughly three refactorings ago. It looks rather alien to me at the moment :D

cheers!

- LSD



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to