Stephen McConnell wrote: > [lifestyle semantics revisited]
Niclas Hedhman wrote: > [pluggable lifestyle?]
We've been over this dozens of times over the last few years, it seems.
You're both proposing (again) what I think has previously shown are incomplete (or at least awkward) decompositions.
IMNSHO the solution lies not in attempting to create another lifestyle decomposition matrix, which will always be incomplete, but rather in "encapsulating change": pluggable component handles and adapters.
---
Fortress shows how clean your code becomes. The recent "fortress migration strategy" (which I don't fully understand the details of) shows that there really is a need for 'nonstandard' lifestyles. PicoContainer (as some of the other new kids on the block as well, BTW) shows that starting with such a concept from the ground up makes your implementation way simpler.
---
anyway, I said it three times now, time to shut up!
back to my corner!
- LSD
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
