Leo Sutic wrote:



From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

a solid defition of the four "standard" lifestyles.



I think we already have that. Pooled means one-per-lookup,
from a common pool, singleton means singleton per container, transient means one new instance per lookup.


Why not just let the definitions stand as they are? I think
they are clear enough. The words "pooled" and "singleton"
are well defined. "Transient" is made up here, but if we
say "one new instance for each lookup()" then I think
most people will understand.


Some questions for you - here is a defintion of a container with two components. Lets assume that the component lifestyle is singleton.


<container name="demo">
  <component type="PersonProvider" name="accounts">
    <configuration>
       <name>Sally</name>
    </configuration>
  </component>
  <component type="PersonProvider" name="logistics">
    <configuration>
       <name>Carol</name>
    </configuration>
  </component>
</container>

I've just broken you defintion of a singeton. My notion of a "singleton" lifestyle is that an instance of an identifiable component deployment scenario may be shared across all requests - and that multiple deployment scenarios may coexist for that type. In the above example - we would see two component managers each differentiated in terms of the deployment scenario (different confuration or parameters, etc.).

Transient - a new instance per lookup - fine with that.
Pooled - nothing more than a managed transient.
Thread - same as singleton except that is scope with respect to sharing is a new instance per thread.


Stephen.

--

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to