On Monday 20 October 2003 06:27, Stephen McConnell wrote: > What are other peoples thoughts about the current kernel loaders (I > think we can do better that the content I've written). Any ideas on what > a kernel controller would look like? Perhaps a controller would > aggregate info form the context and the runtime kernel and it would also > be the MBean point of access. Maybe taking Alexis' content as the MBean > starting point for a controller, perhaps moving this closer to the > DefaultEmbeddedKernel or perhaps recutting DefaultEmbeddedKernel to be a > DefaultKernelController that hides all of the thread stuff. With > something like that we could backport the functionality into the > plugins, abstract test case, and other related embeddors.
the MBean/Jboss approach, provide compatibility with all current JBoss applications. I'm not sure this is the best solution, but this could be considered as A solution. I'm going to spend few hours on this to check if there are some pitfalls. I'm also ready to dig the Eclipse pluging path (if required). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
