Alexis Agahi wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2003 06:27, Stephen McConnell wrote:
What are other peoples thoughts about the current kernel loaders (I
think we can do better that the content I've written). Any ideas on what
a kernel controller would look like? Perhaps a controller would
aggregate info form the context and the runtime kernel and it would also
be the MBean point of access. Maybe taking Alexis' content as the MBean
starting point for a controller, perhaps moving this closer to the
DefaultEmbeddedKernel or perhaps recutting DefaultEmbeddedKernel to be a
DefaultKernelController that hides all of the thread stuff. With
something like that we could backport the functionality into the
plugins, abstract test case, and other related embeddors.
the MBean/Jboss approach, provide compatibility with all current JBoss applications. I'm not sure this is the best solution, but this could be considered as A solution.
I'm going to spend few hours on this to check if there are some pitfalls.
Super!
What I have in the back of my head is one controller class and a bunch of different embeddors that all use the same controller.
I'm also ready to dig the Eclipse pluging path (if required).
Maybe a skeleton could be interesting - i.e. the some bootstrap suff to link into Eclipse - and then we add out internal spells!
Steve.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]