On Wednesday 29 October 2003 17:24, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Should a container/component contract deal with constructors? Probably -
> but with a very strong and consitent semantic model (which IMO means not
> passing services directly via a constructor, but supporting
> container/component artifacts [e.g. service manager, context, logger,
> etc.]).
public class ABitMoreModernComponent
{
public ModernComponent(
Logger logger,
ServiceManager man,
Context ctx,
Configuration conf
)
{
}
}
and the next step(?)
public class MyModernComponent
{
public ModernComponent(
Logger logger,
ServiceManager man,
Context ctx,
MyModernComponentConfiguration conf
)
{
}
}
pubilc interface MyModernComponentConfiguration
{
String getWhatever();
int getSomeValue();
MyObject getSomeComplexType();
}
Hmmmm....
How come I suddenly is not so happy with the Avalon Framework way of doing
things, as I was a few months back?
Cheerio
Niclas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
