<snip/> > The notion of a root group - this would imply that a repository is > implicity a group (which kind of makes sence - but kind of does not - > depending on your viewpoint). If a repository is viewed as a group
Interesting this I think is your concept of a repository catalog if you remember the earlier conversation. > (e.g. a group of groups) then I think we are missing a descriptor. I.e. > we would have descriptors for artifacts, groups, and repositories. > > 0..n > InfoDescriptor <>------- Property > ^ > |-----------------------| > | 0..n | 0..n > ArtifactDescriptor <-----<>GroupDescriptor <------| > ^ | > | | > RepositoryDescriptor <>----| > > > UML via ASCII. > <> aggregates > ^ extends Only you would be crazy enough to do UML via ASCII and make it work! Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
