On Sunday 09 November 2003 11:35, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Just working my way though .... > > In RepositoryAgent > > * @param resourceGroupIdentification is the group that holds the > resources. If the parameter > * is an empty string, the root resource group is requested. The > identification must be > * repository relative. > > The notion of a root group - this would imply that a repository is > implicity a group (which kind of makes sence - but kind of does not - > depending on your viewpoint). If a repository is viewed as a group > (e.g. a group of groups) then I think we are missing a descriptor. I.e. > we would have descriptors for artifacts, groups, and repositories.
Please elaborate on the difference between a Repository descriptor and a Group descriptor. And isn't my ResourceInfo and ResourceGroupInfo those descriptor interfaces?? Or are you trying to say that you need descriptors of metainformation? > 0..n > InfoDescriptor <>------- Property > ^ > > |-----------------------| > | 0..n | 0..n > > ArtifactDescriptor <-----<>GroupDescriptor <------| > ^ | > > RepositoryDescriptor <>----| > > > UML via ASCII. > <> aggregates > ^ extends Who needs TogetherJ, when you have Wordpad ?? ROTFL. Ascii Artists never stops amazing me... (but look at it with a proportional font ;o) ) But seriously, to the far right you have an extend and an aggregate that I don't follow. Is that the implementation side? Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
