On Tuesday 11 November 2003 19:48, Eric Pugh wrote: > I've been gone for a couple days, and 461 avalon messeges
It is an idication that the "community is dead" to cite a famous Cocooner... > And, since I have lots of ideas for components that all have licensing > issues, why not have a sf.net site? Maybe instead of Avalonia, just call > it avalon-components.. I, for one, agree... I think the only issue with the more hard core Apache guys (I'm not pointing a big finger at you Stephen) is the "endorsement", implied or otherwise, that Avalonia or avalon-components, is given. Nothing but the name can stop an SF site to get going (except lack of interest)... My personal opinion, ASF have deniability and can wash their hands, Avalon gets more components (albeit not all with top quality) and invdividual developers gets a lower entry barrier.... Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
