Peter Courcoux said: > I am not sure why, but I think that once code gets to commons it > becomes less 'supported' by those that wrote and understand it, > who tend to concentrate, understandably, on the major projects, > Avalon, Cocoon, Turbine etc. that they are involved in. Also the > volume of mail is huge and difficult to follow and I think things > get lost.
1. I don't know if what Peter says is correct or not. 2. IF Avalon + Maven + (whoever.needed) manage to get together and make REAL browsable Component Libraries a reality, then Jakarta-Commons wouldn't need to exist, or at least not "for everything", which now seems to be the case. 3. A follow-up question would also be, Why Event only? Why not the entire Excalibur and Cornerstone? I don't have a strong opinion about it, for a change :o) Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
