On Saturday 17 January 2004 09:55, Stephen McConnell wrote: > >[X] Say no to ROLE constant > >[ ] Keep it > > My opinion [X] Say no to ROLE constant - but with some comments. > Firstly, existing declarations of ROLE have to stay on release products > for reasons of backward compatibility - and secondly, Fortress is not > yet meta enabled and is probably using ROLE as a pattern. With Fortress > updated I think the ROLE pattern can safely retired.
Yes, I agree (I (who else?) never understood it). The ROLE constant is a recommended pattern, right? The existing ROLE in all the components must remain! Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
