On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 17:40, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Sorry dude thought I had the dev list there. ALex
No problem.
I have a couple questions though.
What do you mean by "say no"? Are we going to change all excalibur
components which have it?
That's not an option so long as there are ECM users out there. But "saying no" can be interpreted as deprecating the usage pattern.
Are we going to put disclaimers in the documentation that say "don't do it this way"? Or modify all documentation?
I think we need to purge the notion from the documentation.
The ROLE thing was really just a shorthand, a shortcut. In general it's
equivalent to MyService.class.getName(); or the fully qualified
classname of the service in question.
But its not necessarily the same. I remember a long time ago raising the same subject and it was explained to me that the string returned by ROLE need not be the same as the interface classname. Anyway, I've never managed to get a clean computationally answer on the ROLE question.
Stephen.
--
|------------------------------------------------| | Magic by Merlin | | Production by Avalon | | | | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | | http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest | |------------------------------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
