I don't see any harm or problem adding this interface to framework. No container will crash, no users will shout in panic. A Reconfigurable semantic is another issue that deserves another discussion.
By now, the addition of this interface seems ok. Remember that a -1 is a VETO and that is IMO a bit radical position to take. regards, hammett -----Mensagem original----- De: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Although I need this sort of mechanism myself, I am not supportive of this proposal in its current form, and feel a vote is a bit pre-mature, especially since it involves Framework. -1. IMHO, I think this should be bundled with nailing down the Reconfigurable() semantics and life cycle as well. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
