On Thursday 22 January 2004 13:04, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia - SPO) wrote: > I don't see any harm or problem adding this interface to framework. No > container will crash, no users will shout in panic. A Reconfigurable > semantic is another issue that deserves another discussion.
By extension, we could then add arbitrary interfaces to Framework, and implement this arbitrarily in various containers, since it doesn't affect anyone?? > Remember that a -1 is a VETO and that is IMO a bit radical position to > take. I know. The reason for "my veto" in this case is because I think it is pre-mature, and need a bit more debate. Introduction of an interface, on the basis "it doesn't hurt" is not good enough - It DO hurt the long-term, we can't remove it. I also don't have the tools of expression in the votes. +0, -0 is still an "abstain" vote. In my book it is more like, I don't care. Ex; +1, +1, 0, 0, 0 Is this in favour or is disapproved? How do I vote, "I have no opinion." But, this is a slightly different debate, and I think -1 should count as a vote opposing and majority is reached by positive number if adding those votes. Indirectly, I would like to have an amendment to our rules, more in line with parlimentary voting, Yes, No, Abstain (and possibly Veto for certain types, but not all) Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
