> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Historically we have DefaultConfiguration in the framework > impl package > - but that does not mean we cannot deprecate it relative to a > enhanced > version that is not in the framework package. BTW - did you have a > chance to review alternative options that I've put forward. > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=107572321908172&w=2
Stephen, I prefer the -spi solution - (a) in your email, although it would lead to a one-class jar. However, I think deprecating DefaultConfiguration in favor of another implementation, just to get MutableConfiguration in there, or to get a "cleaner" package structure is simply too much hassle for not enough gain. DefaultConfiguration is used in too many places. /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
