----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There is nothing stopping evolution. All I'm saying is that you can not > change the return time on the existing lifecycle extension interface > methods because that would break backward compatibility. I heard ya. > It is clear > the the approaches to container extension are open territory for > evolution - just do it under a fortress scoped package name and you'll > be safe. Then we'll end having two - or more - ways of doing the same thing - semantically, at least. But I'll think about it. -- hammett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
