On Monday 16 February 2004 19:48, hammett wrote: > Why not one proxy and a calling chain? The use could add his steps to the > chain and be happy about it.
I like that !!! Thanks for the idea... > Anyway this should not be specific to merlin. Correct, but I think the first step is to make it Merlin specific, try it and then see how to generalize it. Remember that Stephen's, my and other's vision is that Merlin will become so "decomposed" (dead body?) that you have a bunch of 'facilities', 'features' or 'primordial services' (whatever the name), and introduction of some sort of "server profile" which are predefined standard configurations of usage. Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
