Berin wrote: > Please note that this module was developed by one developer who has yet to sign > the CLA. I would recommend that you concider axing it unless we can get a CLA > in place. Considering that the person has been notified that they need a CLA, > and that no projects I know of are actually using the cache, we need to do > something that protects the ASF and the Avalon project from any potential > indemnity since we can't prove that the author agreed to ensure it is all his > code. That is the purpose of the CLA. > > Anyhoo, you can get rid of one more GUMP issue in the process.
Did anybody come to a conclusions on this? The deadline for CLAs was yesterday. I'd like to see on less Gump nag if this is to go away. regards, Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
