> -----Original Message----- > From: Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia - SPO) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:46 AM > To: Avalon Developers List > Subject: Re: [avalon] State of Consensus > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Farr, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * Leo Simons has left the dev@ list. Not sure if he'll be back. > > We should at least try to change his mind. > > > Do you think we need a "formal" dev and/or PMC vote on #1? > > Yes.
We'll it is certainly a consideration. Greg Stein said something recently about us relying on votes too much. It's much better if we can see that everyone agrees and move forward in a less formal way. However, if we are going to retire Fortress/Phoenix, we should at least give everyone a chance to have their 'yea' or 'nay' heard. > > Can we just go to vote or do we need yet-another-proposal to summarize > > this? Am I missing anyone's concerns. > > You're missing. I'm watching at the moment. Actually, I'm a +1 on the 'one architecture' idea. My concerns mostly rest with the implementation side of things, but I feel that they are resolvable. > > Thanks to all those who still have hope and are hanging in there! :) > > My last attempt. I realized the this thread was not more the a revised and > updated version of this > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=105958344710704&w=2 > > If it comes back again, then we for sure don't have a future. Not as a > community. You're right in that this is not the first time we've had these discussions. However, I hope it will be the last. Berin's email has a lot of good points in it. In fact, I would recommend everyone review the entire thread just to get an idea of what has happened before. It's "educational." J. Aaron Farr SONY ELECTRONICS DDP-CIM (724) 696-7653 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
