So, from this mail, from Stephen's post last week and from the Aaron's mail I get the statement that (putting it directly) LogKit is dead.
I don't know if this is good or bad, but if you decide this, please state this officially. The next steps as you all outlined should be to move the still interesting parts from excalibur logger to other places where they fit better and "close" excalibur logger. Thanks Carsten Alex Karasulu wrote: > > > I think the general idea is to move the good stuff from > > excalibur-logging over to avalon-logging, thus integrating > it better > > into the core framework and eventually dropping Excalibur > logging (I > > think it should have been in framework to begin with > myself). My only > > concern here is that these logging packages are very close > to Jakarta > > commons-logging and I'd like to see interoperability there and less > > re-inventing the wheel. > > +1 with all points > > > Logkit is a complete logging solution but it's not necessarily any > > better or worse than log4j. There are some thoughts of > removing it in > > favor log4j or perhaps donating it to the logging @ apache people. > > Point is, there's no need to have strong dependencies > between Avalon > > code and LogKit. The containers and components should be log > > framework neutral. > > +1 > > Alex > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
