> -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:32 PM > To: 'Avalon Developers List' > Subject: RE: Logging at Avalon > > So, from this mail, from Stephen's post last week and from > the Aaron's mail I get the statement that (putting it directly) > LogKit is dead.
Certainly nothing has happened with LogKit in a long time. You could look at that as "dead" or extremely "stable." :) Regardless of its stability, I would highly recommend that no one has direct dependencies on LogKit. It's not hard to use something like commons-logging or avalon-logging to do this. This is just a good idea in general. > I don't know if this is good or bad, but if you decide this, please > state this officially. Right now, we still support LogKit. Nothing will happen until the excalibur-logging/avalon-logging package is worked out. Then we need to decide if LogKit stays in Avalon or if the [EMAIL PROTECTED] people would like it. Though I don't want to 'dump' something on them. > The next steps as you all outlined should be to move the still > interesting parts from excalibur logger to other places where they fit > better and "close" excalibur logger. Yep. J. Aaron Farr SONY ELECTRONICS DDP-CIM (724) 696-7653 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
