On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 19:38, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Carsten:
A lifecycle extension dealing with an alternative configuration model should not go under Fortress - instead it should be located somewhere like excalibur-configuration or perhaps more appropriate .. avalon-components.
What's your opinion?
Stephen.
was this commit part of this?
http://www.osoco.net/weblogs/rael/archives/000239.html
It's talking about the same thing. Only point is that the solution is specific to Avalon - not Fortress. I.e. the solution is a lifecycle extension.
Cheer, Stephen.
--
|------------------------------------------------| | Magic by Merlin | | Production by Avalon | | | | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | | http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest | |------------------------------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
