Stephen McConnell wrote: > > > Looking at the code - it looks like a component to me in that > there is nothing to say that it is not a component. > Perhaps we have a different opinion what a component is :) A component is something (a service) an application can use and the component is provided by a container. This extension is a feature for the container not for the application.
> > Would do you think of moving this to e-lifecycle-impl? > > My preference would be to move it to a package under > avalon-components. > I could set it up if you like (have more than a couple of > things to take care of there anyway so it would not be a problem). > No, please not - Fortress is a container that manages components. So, from this POV it doesn't make sense that the container has a dependency to components. To much dependencies make things too complicated imho. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
