Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 March 2004 16:52, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > what's the purpose of duplicating the i18n code from excalibur, > > repackaging it and putting it in Avalon Util? > > The purpose is for you not to notice :o) > :)
> Seriously, I want to rip away Merlin from being dependent on > excalibur-xxx, to allow extensions of these without to worry > about what else may or may not break with it. > For instance, > why is there a Security check for clearing the cache, but > nothing else? Why is there all these half-meaningless > getDouble(), yet no support for important stuff like images and sound? Ok, so the plan is to first move/copy the package and then perhaps change it to reflect merlin's needs, right? I understand. What do you think of deprecating the excalibur version. It's not maintained anyway and gives the users a clear statement. > > Expect the same fate for excalibur-configuration. > Yes, I expected this :) And plese also do this for excalibur-logger (my current favorite). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
